XerNosam
Member
Okay I will try that thank youDON'T QUIT
just turn slower. counterintuitive, but it works
Okay I will try that thank youDON'T QUIT
just turn slower. counterintuitive, but it works
Yes I do sometimes. I look for mistakes but have trouble fixing them.Heck if I know yet as I'm only approaching sub 40 consistently. But do you record your solves and watch with an eye for what can be improved?
I just cannot get my cross+ F2L to 11 seconds. I have tried everything; reducing my tps to 1,2,3,and even 4. I just cannot get it to work.try to get cross + f2l in 11 seconds,
thats what i tries when i had te same problem and now im average 17
concentrate on f2l
If 3 TPS isn't enough for an ~11 second F2L, your solutions may not be efficient enough. Take a look at reconstructions of people's solves on RCDB or looking at algorithms on AlgDB, and see if there are any solution to cases which are better than what you currently use.I just cannot get my cross+ F2L to 11 seconds. I have tried everything; reducing my tps to 1,2,3,and even 4. I just cannot get it to work.
Gan SMWhat kind of cube?
algorithmic f2lIntuitive or algorithmic f2l?
2 look oll and 1 somtimes 2 look pll2 look oll? What about pll?
Get your F2L down to 9 seconds, and you entire LL down to 6 seconds. If your cross stays the same, the 9+6+3 = 18 seconds.My cross takes me about 3 secs
my f2l takes me about 12 secs
my oll takes me about 4 secs
my pll takes me about 4
4+4+12+3=23 secs
I do.One thing that should help is understanding why your F2L algs do what they do.
My f2l is about 10 -11 secs! yay!Get your F2L down to 9 seconds, and you entire LL down to 6 seconds. If your cross stays the same, the 9+6+3 = 18 seconds.